1
Jonclosure 1.
میز
sir,
Chambers,
Supreme Court, Hongkong,
March, 1909.
C.O.
12798
RECR
REGP 15 APR 09
237
I have the honour to acknowledge Your Excel-
-lency's letter of 11th. January in which you inform me hy
request of the Secretary of State that he regrets that I should
have embarked in newspaper correspondence relating to the
proposals I had made for increasing the Long Vacation. The
Secretary of State further expresses the opinion that newspaper
controversy hardly conduces to the dignity of the Bench upon
which I hold a conspicuous position. I have the honour to
request that this letter should be transmitted to the Secretary
of State.
2.
I an glad in the first place to observe
that the Secretary of State is not of opinion that there was any
breach of the Colonial Regulations as it appeared to him to be
the fact at first, as expressed in the Secretary of State's
despatch of 5th. August, 1908, and as surrested by His Excel-
-lency the Governor in his letter of 18th. June.
3.
In spite of this however, the expression
of the Secretary of State's opinion that I had not been duly
observant of the dignity of the Bench is I believe unmerited.
That such an opinion should be held by the Secretary of State
is exceedingly galling to a Judge whose whole aim since his
appointment to the Colony has been to raise the Bench to a
position more suited to the dignity which the Supreme Court
should hold than it has hitherto done, and who in the instance
was actuated solely by the desire to restore its dignity which
was being shaken by the unfortunate events which led up to the
letter. I desire therefore in the first place to remove the
impression
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.